THE SMART TRICK OF 800X THAT NOBODY IS DISCUSSING

The smart Trick of 800x That Nobody is Discussing

The smart Trick of 800x That Nobody is Discussing

Blog Article

I am going to bite, I am a new shooter and like 800x. I am utilizing a Grabber, how can I load a sluggish burning powder accurately?

With that in your mind, Self Protection sort masses are taken into account functionality smart so velocities are less, to stop move thru or explosive enlargement.:shocked:

Navy veteran and expert reloader Bruce Hodgdon was Performing being a salesman when he heard which the U.S. armed forces planned to ruin A large number of barrels of unneeded powder right after WWII. Nevertheless he wasn’t absolutely sure there could be a commercial marketplace for the surplus powder, he took a danger and purchased (by using a mortgage against his daily life insurance policies plan) 50,000 lbs of surplus 4895 powder.

My to start with clue that Don Zutz' content articles needed to taken that has a shaker of salt. I purchased twelve lbs . on his Shooting Trap/Shotgun Sports activities (two post) suggestion and bought burned for just a c-Be aware or more.

I bought a little bit improved outcomes using the 700 so I stayed with it. If an individual has one of several more mature Dupont load manuals it will likely have the masses for 800X. just my working experience anyway. james

dubob reported: It hardly ever ceases to amaze me that folk will arrive at this Site and Other individuals to question an issue a couple of manufactured item fairly that Get hold of the company direct. Had the OP bothered to do that, he would have found out that 800X was discontinued 5 a long time in the past on account of insufficient sales and 700X is STILL in production.

Superior get started hanging on to the data guides of many years past exactly where they really supply the right facts with pressures...Copy and paste into word information and preserve the electronic mentioned things also. I preserve my more mature knowledge books for that purpose also.

They told me that both seven hundred-X and 800-X at the moment are discontinued powders which was a huge trouble for them. Has anybody else read these two powders are away from manufacturing?

By the way, This is certainly only according to remembered "in industry" measurements and should not be taken as actuality. You should Do not Assume This really is actuality and thrust past force signs. At this time This is certainly almost nothing greater than a curious observation and lead to for dialogue.

Again, This is often only a principle, but when it's wherever in the vicinity of accurate, it could lead to some really major sudden overpressures whenever a seemingly benign load quickly and unexpectedly receives a 100% burn and subsequent large strain spike.

LondonDave is a comparatively new reloader. Let's not advocate factors to him which are a lot less than prudent. Any suggestion for the load should be verifyable in recent details. This load cannot be so verified and should be summarily turned down as sound reloading suggestions.

of direct. Apart from 800x dropping down on the lead, with considerably less recoil you'll delight in taking pictures a lot more and uncover you might really start off breaking far more targets.

It's only any time you transcend their information (and sure still inside of 10mm's SAAMI spec) that 800-X results in being the 800x king from the 10mm hill. I just come to feel restricting 800-X to thirty,000psi only in 10mm does no excellent for any person. It would not assist us be Risk-free, for the reason that most of us will drive over and above their revealed utmost since we see there is area to spare, and loading blind will not be Harmless. Additionally, it undoubtedly isn't going to enable their standing or powder.

For the duration of the peak of the powder crunch I traded Yet another SGW member some 800X for 231. He employs a Spolar and he was joyful enough loading 20g with it, he desired to trade for the rest. I held it while. It is really this kind of a versatile powder if you can function across the measuring concerns.

Report this page